Dilbert Principle
Origin: Scott Adams (1996)
Biological Parallel
When elimination costs exceed containment costs, organisms sequester rather than remove. Plant hyperaccumulators demonstrate this principle at extreme scale: alpine pennycress (Noccaea caerulescens) accumulates zinc at concentrations 100-fold higher than typical plants by sequestering it in vacuoles rather than expending energy to exclude it. The vacuole becomes a molecular junk drawer—isolate the problem where it can't cause harm. Metal tolerance protein MTP1 expression runs 3.5-fold higher in hyperaccumulators compared to normal plants, actively pumping metals into vacuolar storage. Cells apply identical logic to damaged proteins. Rather than immediately degrading misfolded proteins through energy-intensive proteasomal pathways, cells sequester them in aggresomes—membrane-less compartments that quarantine the problem. Autophagy eventually clears aggresomes, but sequestration buys time and reduces immediate metabolic costs. Fat-soluble toxins like DDT and PCBs get stored in adipose tissue because excretion through kidneys (water-soluble pathway) would require expensive metabolic conversion. Containment in fat costs less than transformation and elimination. Melanin production follows the same economic logic. UV radiation damages DNA, creating toxic photoproducts. Rather than constantly repairing all damage, melanocytes sequester the damaged molecules by binding them to melanin polymers, creating a permanent toxic waste repository in melanosomes. The Dilbert Principle emerges from thermodynamics: when the cost of fixing a problem exceeds the cost of isolating it, biology chooses isolation. Promoting incompetent employees into harmless management positions mirrors vacuolar sequestration—containment where they can't damage core operations costs less than the conflict and turnover of firing them.