OpenAI
OpenAI burns $5B yearly pursuing r-selection: 7 model families in 18 months, 800M users, but enterprise share halved as Anthropic's K-strategy wins trust.
OpenAI exemplifies r-selection in the AI ecosystem: rapid reproduction of models (7 families in 18 months), wide dispersal (800 million weekly users), and aggressive territory expansion. From GPT-4o to o3 to the integrated GPT-5, their release cadence mirrors annual plants broadcasting seeds before winter.
The metabolic cost is staggering. In 2024, OpenAI lost $5 billion on $3.7 billion revenue—a 135% burn rate. Projected losses through 2028 total $44 billion. This is classic r-selection: maximize growth rate over efficiency, colonize territory before competitors establish. The $500 billion valuation (October 2025) represents bet on winner-take-all dynamics, not current fundamentals.
Yet first-mover advantage is eroding. Enterprise market share dropped from 50% (2023) to 25% (2025) as Anthropic's K-selected strategy—fewer, higher-quality models with safety emphasis—captures risk-averse buyers. ChatGPT's consumer dominance (59.5% market share, down from 76%) faces Red Queen dynamics: running faster just to maintain position.
The Microsoft symbiosis ($14 billion invested, 27% ownership) creates obligate mutualism. Neither partner can easily exit. Microsoft provides compute, distribution, and enterprise relationships; OpenAI provides the models. This path dependence constrains strategic options—like mitochondria unable to survive outside their host cells.
OpenAI Appears in 2 Chapters
OpenAI exemplifies the 20% of situations where Pacific Salmon growth-at-all-costs strategy is appropriate due to winner-takes-all dynamics.
When OpenAI's burn rate strategy makes sense →OpenAI maintained 25-30% turnover during exploration (2019-2022), then reduced to 12-15% post-ChatGPT to stabilize and scale.
How OpenAI modulated talent migration by lifecycle stage →